Tournaments in Australia are rated in the national system provided they meet ratabilty criteria The algorithm is an adapted version of Elo Ratings
You can inspect the list of players ranked by rating:

RATING.DAT and ratings software for tournament organisers here

Criteria for inclusion

Generally, a tournament will be rated if it meets the criteria of a standard tournament. Non-standard tournaments may still be rated if they are approved for rating by CASPA on the recommendation of advisers appointed.

CASPA has the right to veto the rating of any tournament, either before or after the event, which fails to meet the criteria. Internet and handicapped tournaments will not be rated by the national system. Last reviewed: June 2009


After a player has competed in their first official tournament, they will be assigned a player rating. This rating will be adjusted after each tournament that the player takes part in from then on. A new player is considered to have a provisional rating until reaching 50 rated games. Ratings are used to divide players into tournament Sections. They are also used to set minimum ability levels at major tournaments and for selection of representative teams. In Australia, our National Ratings System includes players from all States. Dormant players, overseas players and players not belonging to one of the State Associations may be removed without notice. The National Ratings System incorporates the maintenance of a National Ratings file, a text file called RATING.DAT with rating information for each player. A typical line in RATING.DAT looks like this
  WSHA NSW William Shakespeare  2337 1396 20171104
WSHA is an abbreviation, NSW is the player's state, 2337 is the number of rated games, 20171104 is 2017 Nov 4, which is the date the player last played in a rated tournament.

How It Works

Ratings curve

The rating system is essentially the Elo rating system. At the heart is a rule which models the probability that a higher rated player will beat a lower rated player. The curve is a function of the difference in ratings. Prior to Dec 1, 2006, Australia used a logistic curve with a slope parameter of 172. The formula (expressed in spreadsheet language) is 1/(1 + EXP(-x/172)). However checking the actual win rates using many games shows that the curve is wrong.
For instance when the ratings difference is 300, the logistic formula gives the higher rated player an 85% chance of winning, but the data show that they win only 74% of such games.

In 2010 we introduced a straight line rule which better accords with the prior data. Your percent chance of winning is fifty plus one twelfth of the rating difference (but capped at 95%).

The practical consequences are that the higher rated players in a section will find it fairer in maintaining their rating, or being able to progress to the next higher sectionif they can prove their worth.

It was expected that atings would slowly change as the result of the change, and it is possible that we may again get a mismatch between the observed win proportions and the modelled probability. Monitoring has occured from time to time, but no changes have been recommended

Here is an example of how you can calculate your rating change.

Example: You are rated 1453. You win 5 out of 7 games against opponents whose average rating is 1393.

  1. You are 14553- 1393 = 60 points higher on average.
  2. Your calculated probability of winning a game is on average = 50 + 1/12 of 60 = 55%.
  3. You would be expected to win 55% of the 7 games, ie 3.85 games.
  4. You actually won 5 games, which is +1.15 games better than expected.
  5. A multiplier of 20 usually applies1. Your rating gain is 1.15 x 20 = 23 points
1. A multiplier will effectively be larger than 20 for a provisional player. Players new to our rating system are deemed provisional until they have 50 rated games. Their first few tournaments are in effect treated as one big tournament. This smooths out fluctuations and will allow them to rise more rapidly if they improve during the provisional period. The source code in Perl can be downloaded by right clicking here.
Revised 3 July 2022 to include info previously found on other pages.
Introduction National System Criteria for inclusion